Germany shaken by the National-Socialist Underground case

A serious scandal had shaken  Federal Republic of Germany after the information about the National-Socialist Underground group was revealed.

At the beginning of November the bodies of Uwe Mundlos and Uwe Böhnhardt, who had seemingly committed suicide, were found in the forest near East-German town of Zwickau. Several hours later their flat on the town’s suburbs was blown up. An explosion was detonated by Beate Zschäpe, who turned herself into police days later.

All three were connected with the organization identified as National-Socialist Underground. According to the evidence collected by German police, they were responsible for murders of 10 German citizens of Turkish descent as well as numerous bank robberies.

When the case was revealed to the German public it has opened a discussion about the defaults of the homeland security agencies. There are many doubts about the way how the case of NSU was being investigated.

Let us better think, if the whole case got into the light now, in order to cover something much more important?

source1/source2

Google makes intelligence work much harder

Sir David Pepper - former director of GCHQ, the royal agency for electronic communication has claimed that because of the Google the work of the intelligence had become much harder. 

He called this “the Google effect”, because as he stated the existence of popular search engine had simplyfied the research of information in the web. So much information being available in the web had  raised the “threshold for producing intelligence” for MI5, MI6 and GCHQ. 

“Intelligence producers have had to become very sensitive to this phenomenon and very careful not to put effort into producing intelligence that purports to be secret which is in fact not secret at all.” - he said during the Annual Lecture in the Institution of Engineering and Technology. 

After “the Google effect” hi-rank officials who use the intelligence started to excpect the information much faster than before. “If the intelligence readers are used to getting information online very fast they’re going to expect the intelligence agencies to be able to do much the same thing,” he added. 

Source: The Telegraph

The encyclopaedia of conspiracy: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion

It is difficult to find a document that arouses so much controversy as “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”. The representatives of the scientific world, journalists and politicians have been discussing its authenticity for almost a hundred years. “The Protocols” have became a serious reading in some countries. 

However, let’s start from the beginning. 

“The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” have appeared in 1903, in the form known to a today’s reader in the Petersburg magazine “Russkoje Znamia” for the first time . They became particularly popular two years later, when they were published as a separate book. This publication was associated with the activity of the Black Hundreds and Okhrana, which treated the liberalization after 1905 as an attack on the integrity of Russia, shifting all the blame on the “international Jewish conspiracy”. 

This document was also used after the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, when the Jewish relations with the international communist movement were directly associated with the theses included in “The Protocols...”. What is interesting, Henry Ford was one of the most well-known promoter to them, who financed the printing of 500 thousand copies in the very 1920. Despite the wide criticism, satire gained considerable popularity, yet before II World War. However, “The Protocols” gained the greatest popularity in the West but in the Islamic countries. One can find a lot on this topic in the Menahem Milson’s article, showing that “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion were published and distributed wider in the Arabic world than in any other part of the world for the last half a century. The Protocols were already published in Arabic in 1925 for the first time but this anti-Jewish satire did not play a significant role in fight between the Arabian people and Zionism for about a quarter of a century.” Of course, the uprising of the Israel country and another wars between the Jewish countries and the Arabian people had decisive influence. As a result of growing conflict and another victories of Israel, the presidents of Egypt, Sadat and Naser, the president Arif from Iraq, the king Fajsal from Saudi Arabia, as well as the Libyan leader Muammar Kaddafi officially supported and recommended reading “The Protocols”. The book was reissued many times and was the bestseller among others in Lebanon and in Iran. 

What is more, “The Protocols” were even adapted to the screen version , whose premiere took place on 6 November 2002. Then, some Arabic TV stations broadcast the first episode of the series entitled “A knight without a horse”. It consisted of 41 episodes and a lot of most significant plot elements based on the fragments of “The Protocols”. A series premiere date does not seem to be accidental because it was the evening in the first day of Ramadan, when the largest number of Muslims sit in front of TV. Despite the protests of many representatives of western countries with the USA in the lead. 

What are “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”? 

A lot of scholars ask this question themselves and this subject makes the atmosphere hotter in many countries. What we can certainly say is that it is a record of the alleged plans which describe the methods of taking over the power over the world by the Jewish. The plan is multifaceted and has lots of polifluence features. It consists in gradual fueling of social conflicts and wars that are supposed to finally lead to a total dominance by the Jewish, the financial factors such as an appropriate control of states budgets, as well as military factors with bomb attacks in cities are also included. Doesn't it sound familiar? Theoretically yes, however, there is a lot of doubts concerning the authenticity of this document. 

First of all, the critics indicate unusual similarity of some fragments of “The Protocols” with a text from a French satire “Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavelli et Montesquieu ou la politique de Machiavelli au XIXe siecle par un contemporain” (The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu) of the French satirist Maurice Joly. Joly himself certainly was not a Jew and the thing he wrote was supposed to be an attack on Napoleon III, above all. It was not an original work because one could clearly notice that it was inspired by the Eugene’s novel “Les Mystères du peuple” (People’s secrets) and even by the earlier anonymous apocryphal work from the XVII century entitled “Jesuits’ confidential pieces of advice” that was written in Poland. As a title of the last work indicates, both it and Sue’s novel did not concern the Jews’ conspiracy but the Jesuits’ order. 

The concept itself of the Jews’ world conspiracy was studied in the XIX century many times, in Russia itself among others by an Orthodox clergyman, Siergiej Aleksandrowicz Nilus, who stated that the “Protocols” come from the first Zionist Congress, which indeed took place in Basel in 1897. Nilus only with time changed his stance and attributed the authorship to “the elders of Zion”. Nilus himself was a clerical assistant of the Moscow Synod archive and his publication was originally entitled “The Great Within the Small” and “Antichrist as a Near Political Possibility”. The goal of publishing it was to deprive the Paris specialist-mason monsieur Philippe of influence and to replace him with somebody who is “closer to the Russian nation”. This person was a charismatic clergyman from Siberia - Grigori Yefimovich Rasputin. 

Well then, do we deal with an absolute falsification? 

“The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” were considered to be false many times by the courts in many countries. It seems that the document itself is indeed fake. However, isn’t there a grain of truth in it? According to Darius Ratajczak, who referred to the statement of Rev. Dr. Stanislaw Trzeciak, the former professor of the Saint Petersburg Roman Catholic Theological Academy, who was a highly regarded Jewish expert, stated that there can be a grain of truth in this document. Is that right? 

J. Tazbir “The Protocols...-truth or falsification” 

http://niniwa2.cba.pl/protokoly_janusz_tazbir_1.htm

The history of the protocols: 

http://religiapokoju.blox.pl/2005/09/Protokoly-Medrcow-Syjonu.html

D. Ratajczak on authenticity of the protocols (+ interesting comments): 

http://marucha.wordpress.com/2011/03/13/dariusz-ratajczak-protokoly-medrcow-syjonu-%e2%80%93-falszerstwo-oparte-na-faktach/

Discussion on this issue. 

http://prawda2.info/viewtopic.php?t=11382&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start

The protocols in the Islamic world 

http://www.racjonalista.pl/kk.php/s,1812

article in Wiki: 

http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protoko%C5%82y_M%C4%99drc%C3%B3w_Syjonu

article on reissues: 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contemporary_imprints_of_The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion

Mind control

The experiments on human brain have been carried out for decades. In concentration camps, secret service centres, isolated and controlled mental hospitals. The symptoms of this activity sometimes get into media. They look like a top of the iceberg. They are accompanied by the air of profit made for the human development. How is it really? 

Fiction or reality? 

Some time ago, an interview with a man appeared, who stated that he had fled from a secret UFO base called Dulce after five years, which was somewhere near the Rocky Mountains in the USA. This man said that the aliens had been experimenting with a weapon there. What is more, they had been doing it with the American government’s knowledge and approval. As a result, they have been testing the influence of the weapon on the human body. It fights the enemies without demolishing walls or causing financial losses. According to the witness’ account, its functioning includes three modes. The first mode deafens. However, it can kill if a person has a weak heart. In the second mode, one can levitate and lift living and dead organisms with it, regardless of weight. The third mode can be used to paralyze everything that is alive: people, animals and plants. It is extremely dangerous. It can cause paralysis - temporary death. A paralyzed person seems to be dead but they remain suspended in reality. Between life and death. The victim revives within one to five hours. Their vital functions and then consciousness gradually return. However, the paralyzed man’s memory is completely different, irreversibly changed. 

Referring to the described technology has been associated with science fiction films until recently but in the meantime... the American scientists have discovered a biochemical molecule, whose effect in the cerebral cortex lets “revive” the memories or completely forget about some event - rian.ru portal has informed about this fact recently. The scientists from the Medical Centre at the New York University think that this discovery can be useful in treating the memory loss. What is more, people can be helped to forget about painful memories. Formation of connections among nerve cells is a process that is fundamental for memory. The discovery proves that power increase of these connections can influence the strengthening of memory. The scientists do not mention other applications of this invention. Has the mentioned discovery been made recently? 

Playing God 

Since the beginning of the eighties, publications, whose authors discuss a possibility of remote influence on the human mind, appear more often. Western columnists tried to present how the Russian people manipulated the mind. What was the progress of these experiments and what goals they set to themselves. 

In 2007, the prestigious WIRED described an underground laboratory which was located at the end of one of the Moscow tube lines. A Psycho-technological Research Institute conducted human subconsciousness research deep down below the ground. Not without successes. MindReader (also called SSRM Tek) developed by them was supposed to be used at the airports for detection of potential terrorists. Nowadays, it is available as a medical device that is useful in different diagnoses. 

The Institute itself draws directly from the Igor Smirnov’s achievement, a Russian scientist who conducted research into mind control. According to his wife Ruslana, who is a director of the Institute, the Smirnov’s achievement was already applied at the beginning of the eighties of the XX century. It happened during USSR’s invasion of Afghanistan. Influence technology on human mind was supposed to be helpful in fight with mujaheds but also in treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in Russian soldiers. After USSR collapsed, the Smirnov’s discoveries got to the USA, paradoxically among others through the agency of KGB. The institution which wanted to earn on the until recently secret technology, organized a conference, where Chris and Janet Morris, consultants working for the Pentagon, were present among others. 

Smirnov’s works were not the only things. According to the former KGB general Borys Ratnikow, at the beginning of the eighties of the XX century in the area of USSR, there were about 50 centres where research was carried out into human mind remote control. In his opinion this technology was so advanced that services were able to “obtain” information directly from the western officials’ minds. When in 1952, the Soviet and the American scientists had a secret meeting in New Mexico, Russians already had much more interesting research results. 

However, not only Russians carried out similar experiments. Americans themselves came into possession of the Germans’ scientific achievement, who during the World War II conducted ruthless experiments on prisoners in the Dachau camp. Drugs were given during experiments to check humans’ reactions to microwaves. Recruitment of German scientists went within the “Paperclip” operation. These accused of war crimes as a result of Nuremberg Trials were also obtained. 

Development of mind control technology by the Americans was officially connected with suspicions that similar research was carried out by the communists. One was especially afraid of the Koreans who had influence on the American soldiers’ minds that were captured during the war there. Due to this “justified” CIA planned the application of similar solutions on its prisoners of war. In 1953, an MKULTRA project was started, in which LSD was used among other things. The drug was given to the subjects without their knowledge. Experiments were done on prostitutes and mentally ill people as well as on workers of CIA and even on civil servants. 

A Monarch Project was more mysterious. Public opinion learnt about it thanks to Cathy O’Brien, the most famous among people who state that they underwent experiments carried out by CIA. The Monarch Project itself seems to have occult connections and to reach times that precede formation of the Nazi movement. However, O’Brien’s accusations have not been confirmed so far, whereas there is no word about the Monarch Project in the CIA’s documents concerning MKULTRA. 

In 1975, the results of the experiment conducted by the army of the USA were presented. It consisted in stimulation of the human brain by microwaves which produce auditory sensations in it. These were the numbers 1 to 10 in this case. Another example is a Program of Walter Reed Military Research Institute. The rule was similar, everything also starts from auditory stimulation, and finally it leads to taking control of the object. A final report worked out by the Air Force of the USA describes precisely the method that needs to be used in such activities. In fact, of course maximally simplifying, one can encapsulate it in two words: decomposition and recomposition of the human psyche. Firstly, it is necessary to lead to losing abilities to do any actions, and then stimulate the brain from outside in order to reprogram. Modern neurophysiology shows that the greater achievements of modern science are, the greater danger is connected with them. Manipulation with human brain is one of them. 

Vote of objection 

In 2003, one of the Russian weekly stated that there was no doubt as for the fact that techniques of physical and psychological pressure are used and still improved. It was stressed in the publication that it is not possible to confirm the information in sources because none of them would ever agree to it. It concerns data with a “strictly confidential” clause. Earlier in Russia in 2000 Vladimir Lopatin presented a bill to the State Duma, which would regulate the issues of information and psychological security of the Federation. His project was reported by the “Siewodnia” newspaper. The conclusions pointed out to the fact that the means of information-psychological influence can be threatening for the country’s security. Manipulating the individual’s psyche as well as influence on the social consciousness were quoted among other things. 

The second attempt to regulate these issues took place in the USA. The same year. Denis J. Kucinich, the American congressman, presented his bill to the House of Representatives. It was supposed to oblige the president to engage into negotiations concerning the ban of arranging weapon in the outer space. However, the perception of the weaponry systems is crucial for dynamizing the experiments. Usually when we hear about the so-called star wars program, we think about lasers, rockets and big explosions. Meanwhile everything is subtler here. Well, hidden technologies of mind manipulation. The mentioned project said that if the USA do not agree with postulated ban, other countries like Russia will be forced to continue the arms race. The problem is that the international agreement is as always necessary. That is the reason why the ban of inhumane experimentation proposed by the European Parliament and Russia will surely never be confirmed. Even if it happens so, will it be implemented to legislation of individual countries? Is it possible to check whether it is observed? The elites of the USA’s authorities are necessary to take part in it but they do not willingly look at it. The day of September 11 was an excuse for such attitude, after which the Americans toughened the observance of their actions referring to the country’s security. The same terms appear in the elites’ rhetoric as in the president Reagan’s days: Empire of evil, New axis bad. There is no openness or willingness to international co-operation today. Why? To do “good” to a man for sure.

Drone Wars

Drones, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), unmanned aircraft using primarily for military purposes.

In late August, announced information about killing another important Al-Qaeda leader. Atiyah Abd al-Rahman, Libyan considered the number 2 in the current hierarchy of the organization. His death in the mountains in the north-eastern Pakistan on Aug. 22 was another attack, which however were not real soldiers participate- but the combat drones. 

Until recently, they were associated rather with reconnaissance and espionage actions, with their help have been identifying the area around the house where he was to stay Osama Bin Laden, allegedly killed by Navy SEALS in early May. 

Using unmanned aircraft for intelligence purposes could be read for years. In particular, General Atomics MQ-1 Predator – used in years 1994-2011 . Predators were used mainly to reconnaissance actions, but after the U.S. intervention in Afghanistan came the idea to use drone for combat tasks. Until their withdrawal in March 2011 these drones took part in campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq, but also occurred during the Balkan conflicts in Bosnia and Kosovo . 

His successor became the General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper. Reaper is the first airplane hunter-killer type. Is armed with homing bombs using laser or GPS, as well as 14 missiles AGM-114 Hellfire. 

Peaceful transition to offensive operations 

Despite the fact that from year to year their activity increases significantly, to 2011 it was hard to find official reports of using combat drones. According to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, which monitors drones activities it was 295 attacks, which killed about two and a half thousand people. Interestingly, these devices have been used 243 times during Barack Obama’s term of office . They operate mainly in the Middle East, and their activity extends from Kenya and Somalia to the Central Asian countries such as Kazakhstan. The area of greatest concentration of drones attacks is Pakistan, remains formally in military alliance with the U.S. 

The ratio of Pakistan authorities to drones had been changed over the last decade. Shamshad Ahmad, former foreign minister and ambassador of Pakistan to the UN told IPS service, that in 2004-2007 President Pervez Musharraf agreed to drone attacks, in an effort to express support for the administration of George W. Bush in the fight against Al-Qaeda. American side had not only autonomy in the selection of targets, but also support Pakistan government propaganda, and after each drones attack spread the information that the explosions were caused by homemade bombs. 

The entire action could not be kept in secret, because as it turned out, drones attacks were imprecise and often instead of the leaders of Al-Qaeda attacked civilians. 

One of the most famous incidents took place in late October 2006 when it killed 82 people. 

In 2004-2007 as a result of the world's drone attacks killed 168 people, including 109 civilians, of whom 82 were minors. Since 2008, activities have become much more intense. Most of attacks in Pakistan focused on the Taliban, but also when a high percentage of the victims were civilians (1091 killed a total of 2134 in 2008-2011). According to Gareth Porter of IPSnews.net until the events of early 2011 altered the position of the Pakistani authorities. 

Pakistan is a country where unmanned aircraft attacks occurs mostly and number of operations with drones constantly growing. For example, since operation “Dawn Odyssey" in March 2011 till the end of June in Libya was up to 42 attacks. 

Also in Somalia, where American army have not stationed since 1993, in June 23, came to attack at two leaders of the Mujahideen Youth Movement. In the words of an anonymous informant, who spoke to the Washington Post, the killed Somalis "planned to carry out attacks in Europe." 

Changing technology 

The beginnings of research on unmanned combat machines controlled by radio waves back started after the First World War. In early 30s showed the British "DH.82B Queen Bee" and the American Curtiss' N2C-2 ". Unmanned planes were using during World War II in small scale. 

In the postwar period the technology was developed on both sides of the Iron Curtain, Anglo-Saxons developed drones from BTT (Basic Training Target) family, such as the "MQM-36 Shelduck," and "MQM-57 Falconer," which were used till 80 s. At the same time Soviet side also sustained research on unmanned aircraft, the first model was built in the 50s and was the Lavochkin "La-17", the test flights took place in 1953. 

Throughout interwar period studies at drones had a two-way directions – the first was standard airplanes size machines designs , and other small devices, which were harder to shoot, and better for spy actions. The most famous modern "Predators" and "Reapers" are drones with relatively large size required for weapons transfer cameras. 

Scientists are working on drones that imitate birds or insects and will be able to act effectively on battlefield. Pentagon has more than 7 thousands pieces of machinery built in the previous decade, is also planning to devote considerable financial resources needed to develop a technology which by 2030 would enable the creation a "spy fly", intelligent robot, very small size. Although according to official reports, this project is still at an early stage, it does all sorts of "leaks" suggest that in many cases are already tested prototypes, such as for example disclosed in February, drone-hummingbird project created by Californian company AeroVironment. 

Will the new technology and improved drones will be able to carry out an attack anywhere in the world will make the number of civilian casualties decrease? According to former CIA officer, Philip Giraldi is impossible, because as he said in an interview with Russian television RT "weapon is dependent on espionage which identify terrorist and this is not the best, so I suspect that modern technology will not grand difference ". 

The effects of increasing the presence of drones in warfare 

All indicate that robots will be the future of the military, and as noted James Corbett , an independent analyst and columnist, "the question arises whether the U.S. drone attacks in Pakistan and Yemen are not actually promise a new era in warfare, an era in which military intervention will take place simply because it can be done without any risk for the attacker ". 

In the face of Obama's promised to withdraw 33,000 U.S. troops from Afghanistan until September 2012, using remotely controlled devices to carry out further acts of war seems to be a logical direction. Since the war in Vietnam, which ended with, inter alia, as a result of public pressure, the number of casualties on the side of American soldiers is an important factor in support for the war operations. Reduction of this factor through because of using combat drones may lead to a significant decrease in the number of casualties on the American side, thereby significantly reducing the pacifist sentiment. 

Another important result is that people will make decisions regarding life and death without endangering their own lives. Until now, strongly acted psychological factor, where the soldier through a direct presence on the battlefield was in direct contact with the enemy. This drone pilot direct contact disappears, while the same actions are beginning to resemble a computer game where the character is a virtual enemy. 

Wikileaks - a false myth

Wikileaks portal, as well as its founder Julian Assange, has caused a lot of confusion within last year and has become a specific fight icon for freedom of speech. Is it really so? I have been examining this service for some time and everything indicates that there is a a clear discrepancy among declarations and facts. As a result, Wikileaks inspires restriction of freedom against declarations. 

Julian Assange 

Both a controversial and secret figure. He himself does not want to allegedly disclose information about him due to security reasons. One can understand that things that get out make others think, though. First of all, information about his relations with a scientological church, with which he allegedly broke off. Wikileaks is not Assange only but also some hackers, who are not of anyone’s interest by a strange twist of fate, who do not shine in media. If one asked a question about things that are very inconvenient for establishment, then it would appear that his views do not diverge from popular opinions presented in so-called mainstream, which completely ignore even meetings of the Bilderberg group. 

Who finances Assange is a question which is a matter of much vagueness. His activity and everyday move from and to the hotel, as well as his changes of the phone number cost. The portal is supported declaratively from the voluntary means, indeed but has anyone seen a statement of this voluntariness? 

A lawyer, who represents the company’s problems before the British Court is Mark Stephens, a famous London lawyer, who has become famous for many spectacular cases (among others defending Greenpeace, acting against McDonald's and Royal Dutch Shell but also defending Wall Street Journal and he has represented Charles Dawkinson in the process against Benedict XVI lately), he is also associated with a well-known financier George Soros. Stephens has represented his clients for free many times, so probably his help for Assange is alike. Nevertheless, are all “fighters for freedom of speech” supported in the same way? Does Wikileaks itself defend the oppressed defenders of freedom? 

“Wikileaks” 

The date of creating Wikileaks can be found in Wikipedia and on tens of other websites. However, if one thinks since when we can hear about the portal, then a serious clash appears. It seems to be for a short time. Majority of people heard actually about the portal only last year, after media distributed the alleged scandal when the film from Iraq had been published by Wikileaks, where two Iraqi employees of the Reuters agency die during the attack of the Apache helicopter. 

Other curiosity - Daniel Domsheit-Berg, the former Assange’s employee, started a new Openleaks service in April 2011, which is supposed to be a platform for free placing of different leaks types on them that come from very different sources. How does it differ from Wikileaks? First of all, it is a true portal form, which stopped working for some time in December 2009 and came back in a new form, where data is “verified” by the Wikileaks team and placed on servers later. The information was earlier verified by the readers themselves. Does it build declarative freedom of speech? 

Unusual access to the greatest media in the world 

Criticism of all so-called trackers of conspiracy theories and alternative media representatives is certainly justified in this issue, even if it is caused by jealousy. After all, years of a strenuous work, searches and laborious collection of documentation gives only a Sisyphus’ label to many - a madman or Don Quixote fighting windmills. Doesn’t it verge on the miraculous, when a completely unknown “hacker” representing a niche portal, breaks through to the biggest media concerns? 

A well-known Austrian journalist Jane Bugermeister noticed rightly that when “German journalists such as Harald Schumann state that such magazines as Der Spiegel censor his articles concerning financial crimes and censorship is a common practice, Assange’s face is visible on the Spiegel website main page as a fighter for freedom of speech”. 

Assange himself never wastes an opportunity to give an interview or talk with media. The only thing that misses are T-shirts with an image of a slim grey-haired fighter for freedom of speech. A number of interviews and attention given to the creators of Wikileaks, media already place him on shelves among the most popular celebrities. One can win the world having such support, let’s think who and why stands behind Wikileaks? 

Middle East revolution - example 1 

Information published by Wikileaks concerning local leaders’ corruption was the ignitor of Middle East revolutions, especially in Northern Africa (Tunisia, Egypt). It led to protests, and as a result made Ben Alego leave Tunisia and Hosni Mubarak fled from Egypt. These countries belonged to the fiercest opponents of the USA or Israel. However, people who did not have much in common with Egypt itself came to the country during the revolution but especially such people as Mohammed ElBaradei were active on the international arena. As a result, there is still nothing of democratization on the horizon and the only result is that these countries became de facto dependent on the West countries. 

Chip for every European - example 2 

A surprising coincidence took also place in case of publication of witnesses’ testimonies who were kept in the Guantanamo base. They were disclosedmore or less a week before the alleged killing of Osama bin Laden and they contained among others the assassins’ announcement in Europe in case of the Al-Kaida leader’s death. This information constitutes a pretext for sharpening of control in the area of European Union that is plunged in crisis. As a result, it is a step towards mass but very “justified” surveillance of the Europeans. 

Nuclear domino - example 3 

Wall Street Journal referring to Wikileaks wrote: 

“Just after the Americans withdrew missile defense shield from the project and after the Washington - Moscow talks about disarmament system, Russia has located an atomic warhead in the Kaliningrad Oblast.”  

As a result, Wikileaks inspires spreading the information, which strengthens existing dependencies in which Poland remains, via one of the most opinion-forming newspapers in the world. 

Seemingly reliable information acts against declared freedom. 

Importance of information 

The last thing that indicates that Wikileaks and Julian Assange are not these as they are created, is the fact that their activity has brought almost nothing that would not already be known to more curious researchers. In principle, these are only details, additions to information which was earlier written about. 

There are lots of arguments, I will allow myself to quote these that were stated by George Friedman (STRATFOR): 

“Everyone, who was close to battles or who read history of the II World War, will be surprised not by the presence of war crimes but by the fact that there is so few of them among documents concerning this subject available on the Wikileaks servers. A war is controlled violence and when control fails - as it happens without any doubt - uncontrolled and potential criminal activities appear. In the meantime, the publicized cases published by Wikileaks do not clearly show criminal actions of the American soldiers as much as it happens in case of consequence on the part of the insurgents, who break the Geneva Convention”. 

(..)”A similar situation concerns diplomatic leaks. There was much disclosed information that was known to the informed observer. For example, everyone who reads analyses seriously, knows that not only the Israelis but also the Saudis were especially anxious about Israel’s power and pressed the USA to do something in this case. While media treated it as significant news, in fact it required deep ignorance of the Persian Gulf’s geopolitics to treat the American diplomatic notes concerning this subject as surprising”. 

Summary 

The organisation that postulates the implementation of complete transparency in international relations, which let’s be honest, is completely undoable, remains itself extremely mysterious. Instead of dealing with information, it conducts propaganda above all and the question is for whom? 

I am listing the examples of Wikileaks and Julian Assange’s activities today, which do not have much in common with its declarated, how very noble mission - protection of freedom. 

100-year-old cartoons

Some time ago I wrote about RPG cards where the authors had predicted future events that have occurred or are likely to happen in the future. Today, I present something interesting and in a similar vain; nearly 100-year old cartoons published in American press. These drawings, as it turns out, are still very relevant. How come - you may ask - hasn't the World become a safer and richer place over these hundred years? Maybe for someone to have an iPhone and a laptop means security and wealth, but the truth is that the world is governed, to a large extent, by the United States and the United States are still managed the same people: 

Lever of political war 

As you can see, the continuous tug of war between supporters of both parties has not change at all, people wrestle, fight in election campaigns, but the real power belongs to those who are chosen outside the democratic process - the big bankers and financiers of Wall Street. They firmly hold the "lever", which tilts to this or that side. 

Coming money trust 

Octopus - the federal reserve system, comprising a network of private banks, which by drainage of virtually all spheres of economic and politics suck money out of them. 

Perhaps it has never been so evident that central banks play a key role in the economy of a country. It was the result of an irresponsible (and perhaps intentional?) Fed policy that in 2008 the soap bubble of the real estate market burst and then the crisis escalated on the rest of the economy. Whenever we look at the roots of any crisis or conflict in a country, we can see that they are directly connected to the policy of the local central bank. The independence of the local was, among other things, the cause of the "intervention" of NATO troops in Libya earlier this year. 

Rothschilds 

Planned economy and planned destruction? 

This cartoon is much later, at the bottom we see the date 1934. In the far right the image of Stalin and the Kremlin appears.