Libya - the dictator's war

After a long time, on 15 August the Libyans were again able to hear the voice of Muammar Gaddafi on the radio. The Libyan leader urged his citizens to armed struggle, which would free the country from the "traitors and NATO." Although it will soon be six months since NATO troops have launched operation "Odyssey Dawn," the dictator, as he had previously announced, does not intend to give up and wants to fight to the end. The end of what? Does Libya have any special meaning? What is it that it has, if it can mobilize a well-equipped army? Why did the Western countries agree so quickly? Is not this Africa where millions of people die without any attention? Why is it that for some charity music concerts are held, and for the others millions of dollars are spent on bombs? Seen in this light, what is the history of the man whose faith is watched by the whole world?

Right after Fidel

After Fidel Castro's resignation from office, he became the longest-ruling non-monarch in the world. At the same time, however, he never served as president or prime minister, using the title of the leader of the revolution and firmly maintaining that power in Libya belongs to the people. He started as a revolutionary and would soon become a terrorist financing bombings, but later became docile when put up against the wall. He would be a guest of presidents and prime ministers of major world powers.

Muammar Gaddafi was, for many years, a politician supporting terrorism. It was him ho after a three-year trial was found responsible for funding the attacks which ended in crash of a Pan Am airplane in Lockerbee, southern Scotland, in 1988. The support for terrorists officially ended when an embargo was posed contributing to the country's destabilization. However, this did not result in Gaddafi being overthrown. He became more liberal after a couple of years, paid huge compensation and, which probably turned out the decisive factor, he opened the national market for western companies. The dictator decided to buy a pardon and became a figure if not accepted, then surely tolerated on the international arena. He was regarded as an impulsive eccentric who, during a foreign visit never slept in a building, ordering a Bedouin tent pitch to be put up on a hotel lawn. The essence of his character transpires from a scandal that occurred several years ago when his son was arrested by the Swiss police for mistreatment of service. Gaddafi immediately ordered all Swiss companies to leave Libya and the postulated in the international forum the partition of Switzerland. Despite these excesses he was tolerated, while enjoying special affinity with the Italian Prime Minister, Sylvio Berlusconi.

Money coming from oil trade was well invested. Libya is a poor, desert country in which infrastructure, including hospitals and schools, was built. Unlike its neighbors, it has a relatively low degree of illiteracy and few Libyans decided to emigrate.

Day of Wrath and Al-Qaeda

Under the banner of democratization of Islamic countries, American analysts have created a concept of "Greater Middle East". This idea to be realized requires a part of local rulers to be removed. Therefore it is hard to believe that the so-called "Arab Spring" was a spontaneous grassroots movement of people fed up with dictatorship. Just as during the "revolution" in Serbia, Kiev or Georgia, the people who inspired the movements, had undergone training in American NGOs. The events of 2011 differed only in that the protesters made full use of modern means of communication such as Facebook and Twitter.

When the former rulers were overthrown in Tunisia and Egypt, it seemed that it was time for Libya, but here, as it turned out, the case was not that simple.

I find it puzzling that in an interview given for the BBC on February 28, Gaddafi claimed that Al-Qaeda stands behind all the revolutions in the Arab world. These words were confirmed in an announcement of 15 August, when he said that the rebels are Al-Qaeda's agents. Al-Qaeda operating for the U.S.? When someone is accustomed to what (s)he hears in the major mass media, (s)he may be surprised because officially this organization is in open conflict with the countries of the West. In fact, many analysts have for years been pointing out that both Al Qaeda and its famous allegedly late leader, Osama Bin Laden, were from the beginning under the control of the CIA.

Gaddafi's words about al-Qaeda influences in Benghazi and the surrounding area can be confirmed by the fact that the eastern part of the country for years was a center where Al-Qaeda recruited the largest number of suicide bombers, it is where the leader of the Syrian rebellion fled after its brutal suppression by the army of president Assad.

The eastern city of Benghazi is where the protests first started, and then a rebel movement against the government of Gaddafi concentrated, is one more important reason. The city is host to many foreign oil companies that have obtained access to Libyan economy after the first Gulf War.

The question of the rebels' equipment remains unclear. Already one week after beginning of the riots it turned out that they were armed to the extent that allowed to defeat the regular Libyan army. Were they also trained? When on March 19, 2011 operation "Odyssey Dawn" started, information showed up saying that Western aid to the rebels does not only include bombing the government buildings, but also sending weapons. Before his mysterious death on July 28, Gen. Abdul Fattah Younis, a former cabinet minister and leader of the rebel army, admitted that they receive arms delivery from the "friends" whose identity he did not want to reveal. At the same time Great Britain admitted sending about 1,000 sets of body armor for the infantry.

Causes of war - conspiracy theory?

When we take into account the fact that Gaddafi enjoyed a relative support among his citizens and that the revolutions were inspired from the outside, it good to ask yourself what led the U.S., Britain and France to take part in the attack on Libya? For several months a few reasons reasons are officially given.

A piece of information which appeared on the Internet after the start of the civil war in Libya caused a lot of noise. It was said that this country was carrying out a huge investment in the form of irrigation system, which by means of large pumps and piping was to deliver precious water from underground springs beneath the Sahara. This country, though rich in oil, is affected by continuous water and food deficits. This is partly the reason why the embargo imposed on Libya in the 90s was all so painful. Government actions aimed at exploiting the underground water sources and pipelines which could irrigate crops would make this nearly 7-million state largely self-sufficient. It could upset the Western powers, which feared Libya supporting terrorism again, but it could also mean that Gaddafi's even bolder policy would lead completely independence of the great powers.

Another factor that influenced Libya's independence was the fact that thanks to the positive commercial balance this country was not only one of the least indebted countries, but it also had significant gold reserves. One of the first decision of the rebel government in Benghazi, not for no reason, was the creation of its own central bank. For the bankrupting and massively indebted Western countries this oil-rich country, for which they would become creditors, or at least they would trade without looking at the whim of the dictator, could be a very tasty morsel.

So we have water, gold, markets, and oil. All these factors have one common denominator, which is independence. At the time when most countries undergoing globalization without resistance accept the impose rules of the game, Libya was one of the few who wanted to play in their own way.

What you can see and what you cannot see

The decision to launch the operation "Odyssey Dawn" was incredibly fast. Given the problems the Western powers are now currently facing, their leaders should think twice before they decide to launch another costly war. But it was not so. The diplomatic pressure alone was extremely short lasting, while Barack Obama himself was silent on this issue for 6 days before they took the stand. What was he doing and who did he speak to then?

The war continues. Sometimes disturbing reports come to light about the activities of insurgent forces, like these of July 20, when Daily Telegraph reported finding the headless bodies in Libyan uniforms. The bodies were hidden in a water tank, contaminating it effectively. At the same time, the newspaper informed about completely destroyed villages inhabited by tribes that supported Gaddafi.

What kind of future?

Gaddafi, this nearly seventy-year old politician today is one of the most colorful and most controversial figures of the second half of the twentieth century. He ruled his country with a firm hand for over forty years, and until recently one could believe that after his death Libya would plunge into civil war, in which the Libyan tribes would fight for the succession. But it turned out that the war broke out already in his lifetime. It's just that the native tribes played a secondary role in it.

The war in Iraq was a war for oil, Afghanistan is the control drug production. What does control of Libya give? Oil, huge water resources under the desert, close to the coasts of Europe - all this means that Libya will not be left alone. The worst scenario for the "defenders of democracy" is that the country will be divided into two areas of influence in a constant state of cold war, just as Korea. The largest oil reserves are located in the east of the country. Whatever one may write about the war of the dictator, the World will never forget the faces of family members of the victims of Lockerbee.

Libya - the dictator's war

After a long time, on 15 August the Libyans were again able to hear the voice of Muammar Gaddafi on the radio. The Libyan leader urged his citizens to armed struggle, which would free the country from the "traitors and NATO." Although it will soon be six months since NATO troops have launched operation "Odyssey Dawn," the dictator, as he had previously announced, does not intend to give up and wants to fight to the end. The end of what? Does Libya have any special meaning? What is it that it has, if it can mobilize a well-equipped army? Why did the Western countries agree so quickly? Is not this Africa where millions of people die without any attention? Why is it that for some charity music concerts are held, and for the others millions of dollars are spent on bombs? Seen in this light, what is the history of the man whose faith is watched by the whole world? 

Right after Fidel 

After Fidel Castro's resignation from office, he became the longest-ruling non-monarch in the world. At the same time, however, he never served as president or prime minister, using the title of the leader of the revolution and firmly maintaining that power in Libya belongs to the people. He started as a revolutionary and would soon become a terrorist financing bombings, but later became docile when put up against the wall. He would be a guest of presidents and prime ministers of major world powers. 

Muammar Gaddafi was, for many years, a politician supporting terrorism. It was him ho after a three-year trial was found responsible for funding the attacks which ended in crash of a Pan Am airplane in Lockerbee, southern Scotland, in 1988. The support for terrorists officially ended when an embargo was posed contributing to the country's destabilization. However, this did not result in Gaddafi being overthrown. He became more liberal after a couple of years, paid huge compensation and, which probably turned out the decisive factor, he opened the national market for western companies. The dictator decided to buy a pardon and became a figure if not accepted, then surely tolerated on the international arena. He was regarded as an impulsive eccentric who, during a foreign visit never slept in a building, ordering a Bedouin tent pitch to be put up on a hotel lawn. The essence of his character transpires from a scandal that occurred several years ago when his son was arrested by the Swiss police for mistreatment of service. Gaddafi immediately ordered all Swiss companies to leave Libya and the postulated in the international forum the partition of Switzerland. Despite these excesses he was tolerated, while enjoying special affinity with the Italian Prime Minister, Sylvio Berlusconi. 

Money coming from oil trade was well invested. Libya is a poor, desert country in which infrastructure, including hospitals and schools, was built. Unlike its neighbors, it has a relatively low degree of illiteracy and few Libyans decided to emigrate. 

Day of Wrath and Al-Qaeda 

Under the banner of democratization of Islamic countries, American analysts have created a concept of "Greater Middle East". This idea to be realized requires a part of local rulers to be removed. Therefore it is hard to believe that the so-called "Arab Spring" was a spontaneous grassroots movement of people fed up with dictatorship. Just as during the "revolution" in Serbia, Kiev or Georgia, the people who inspired the movements, had undergone training in American NGOs. The events of 2011 differed only in that the protesters made full use of modern means of communication such as Facebook and Twitter. 

When the former rulers were overthrown in Tunisia and Egypt, it seemed that it was time for Libya, but here, as it turned out, the case was not that simple. 

I find it puzzling that in an interview given for the BBC on February 28, Gaddafi claimed that Al-Qaeda stands behind all the revolutions in the Arab world. These words were confirmed in an announcement of 15 August, when he said that the rebels are Al-Qaeda's agents. Al-Qaeda operating for the U.S.? When someone is accustomed to what (s)he hears in the major mass media, (s)he may be surprised because officially this organization is in open conflict with the countries of the West. In fact, many analysts have for years been pointing out that both Al Qaeda and its famous allegedly late leader, Osama Bin Laden, were from the beginning under the control of the CIA. 

Gaddafi's words about al-Qaeda influences in Benghazi and the surrounding area can be confirmed by the fact that the eastern part of the country for years was a center where Al-Qaeda recruited the largest number of suicide bombers, it is where the leader of the Syrian rebellion fled after its brutal suppression by the army of president Assad. 

The eastern city of Benghazi is where the protests first started, and then a rebel movement against the government of Gaddafi concentrated, is one more important reason. The city is host to many foreign oil companies that have obtained access to Libyan economy after the first Gulf War. 

The question of the rebels' equipment remains unclear. Already one week after beginning of the riots it turned out that they were armed to the extent that allowed to defeat the regular Libyan army. Were they also trained? When on March 19, 2011 operation "Odyssey Dawn" started, information showed up saying that Western aid to the rebels does not only include bombing the government buildings, but also sending weapons. Before his mysterious death on July 28, Gen. Abdul Fattah Younis, a former cabinet minister and leader of the rebel army, admitted that they receive arms delivery from the "friends" whose identity he did not want to reveal. At the same time Great Britain admitted sending about 1,000 sets of body armor for the infantry. 

Causes of war - conspiracy theory? 

When we take into account the fact that Gaddafi enjoyed a relative support among his citizens and that the revolutions were inspired from the outside, it good to ask yourself what led the U.S., Britain and France to take part in the attack on Libya? For several months a few reasons reasons are officially given. 

A piece of information which appeared on the Internet after the start of the civil war in Libya caused a lot of noise. It was said that this country was carrying out a huge investment in the form of irrigation system, which by means of large pumps and piping was to deliver precious water from underground springs beneath the Sahara. This country, though rich in oil, is affected by continuous water and food deficits. This is partly the reason why the embargo imposed on Libya in the 90s was all so painful. Government actions aimed at exploiting the underground water sources and pipelines which could irrigate crops would make this nearly 7-million state largely self-sufficient. It could upset the Western powers, which feared Libya supporting terrorism again, but it could also mean that Gaddafi's even bolder policy would lead completely independence of the great powers. 

Another factor that influenced Libya's independence was the fact that thanks to the positive commercial balance this country was not only one of the least indebted countries, but it also had significant gold reserves. One of the first decision of the rebel government in Benghazi, not for no reason, was the creation of its own central bank. For the bankrupting and massively indebted Western countries this oil-rich country, for which they would become creditors, or at least they would trade without looking at the whim of the dictator, could be a very tasty morsel. 

So we have water, gold, markets, and oil. All these factors have one common denominator, which is independence. At the time when most countries undergoing globalization without resistance accept the impose rules of the game, Libya was one of the few who wanted to play in their own way. 

What you can see and what you cannot see 

The decision to launch the operation "Odyssey Dawn" was incredibly fast. Given the problems the Western powers are now currently facing, their leaders should think twice before they decide to launch another costly war. But it was not so. The diplomatic pressure alone was extremely short lasting, while Barack Obama himself was silent on this issue for 6 days before they took the stand. What was he doing and who did he speak to then? 

The war continues. Sometimes disturbing reports come to light about the activities of insurgent forces, like these of July 20, when Daily Telegraph reported finding the headless bodies in Libyan uniforms. The bodies were hidden in a water tank, contaminating it effectively. At the same time, the newspaper informed about completely destroyed villages inhabited by tribes that supported Gaddafi. 

What kind of future? 

Gaddafi, this nearly seventy-year old politician today is one of the most colorful and most controversial figures of the second half of the twentieth century. He ruled his country with a firm hand for over forty years, and until recently one could believe that after his death Libya would plunge into civil war, in which the Libyan tribes would fight for the succession. But it turned out that the war broke out already in his lifetime. It's just that the native tribes played a secondary role in it. 

The war in Iraq was a war for oil, Afghanistan is the control drug production. What does control of Libya give? Oil, huge water resources under the desert, close to the coasts of Europe - all this means that Libya will not be left alone. The worst scenario for the "defenders of democracy" is that the country will be divided into two areas of influence in a constant state of cold war, just as Korea. The largest oil reserves are located in the east of the country. Whatever one may write about the war of the dictator, the World will never forget the faces of family members of the victims of Lockerbee.

London on fire

Nearly twenty years ago, after  Rodney King was beaten the police were for quite a long time not able to control the riots that erupted in Los Angeles. In the middle of the past decade, the suburbs of Paris and Lyon were terrorized by groups of rebellious young people who, through theft, robbery and arson allegedly wanted to express their discontent. Today, as a result of the death of Mark Duggan 29-year-old London is terrorized by well-organized (using Facebook and Twitter) groups of young people who organize riots in yet new districts. What is worse, the conflict spreads onto next cities. 

A lot of myths concerning the riots have sprung up and will spring up. Let us not be naive; simple schemes do not work in in the case of what is happening in England. We are faced with something new, not only because of the use of Internet and mobile phones, which, after all helped the revolutionaries in Egypt not so long ago. You also can not assume that just as it happened in France, the people who made the streets of Ealing, Totenham or Camden look like Baghdad neighbourhoods are just immigrants or their descendants. Among them you can meet native English who, like the others, steal, set fire and fight against police. Neither can we assume that people who rob stores, especially those with jewellery and electronics do it for a reason motivated by ideology. The most important thing to them is to take over the confusion; many do it because their friends do it. There is no place for thinking in a crowd. 

It's hard to tell how it will end, I think this may be just the beginning. For certain, the problem of assimilation of such a large number of immigrants will be presented as the main source of problems. Moreover, let us remember that everything is happening just two weeks after the tragedies in Norway, where the main motive of the bomber was a pro-immigration policy of the ruling party. 

Riots in the streets of England and Greece, protests in Spain, waves of immigrants on the Italian coast, returning and even more serious financial crisis. Are these the first signs of the ending of an era of social order? What we read today in most newspapers or hear on radio and television are: crisis, rebellion, resentment, failure, riots, unemployment, anxiety, conflict. This may be a coincidence, but who knows if this is not another step in the master plan to destroy Europe as we know it. 

U-534 - The case of Hitler's secret weapon

On 5 May 1945, shortly before Germany's capitulation, the lastsubmarine of the U-boat fleet sailed off northwards from the Copenhagen port. Several hours after departure, U-534 led by Kapitänleutnant (Captain Lieutenant) Herbert Nollau came across a British air patrol specialized in fighting submarines. After Germany's defeat many ships headed to Norway where, the British feared, the Germans would regroup and continue to fight. That is why in early May 1945 they began a large-scale campaign against submarines. This confirms why the crew did not want to give up. Captain Nollau refused to surrender and decided to defend the boat and its cargo. 

The crew did not give up despite the calls. Liberators made three approaches. The first one was shot down by boat's anti-aircraft gun. Only the third approach of another plane from the squadron and depth bombs proved fatal for the ship. The U-boat began to sink but 47 of 51 crew members survived. Three sailors died in the water and the rest of the crew, along with the command, were interned. 

U-534's history overgrew with legends over the years. There have been speculations concerning its cargo and mission. Much was said about the alleged stocks of gold on board. The ship had been considered lost until 1986, when it was found. Nine years later, in 1993 it was lifted to the surface. The wreck remained in surprisingly good condition. Contrary to expectations, apart from personal belongings of crew members, nearly one hundred bottles of wine and a box of condoms, no gold was found. But it turned out that the cargo hold contained something really interesting. 

The reason for the fierce resistance proved to be another treasure of the Third Reich - a load of T11 experimental torpedoes; only 38 of these were ever produced. Their most important feature was insensitivity to Foxer acoustic decoys. They were devices towed behind Allied ships. Old type torpedoes would get a fix on the decoys instead of the ship, which would often save the U-boat's target. 

Risking one's own life and the lives of the crew members, especially 5 May 1945, gives rise to two hypotheses. The first is the question whether Kapitänleutnant Herbert Nollau was so ardent a Nazi that he did not accept the possibility of surrender. Rather, it must be assumed that he was a reasonable man, after all, not everyone becomes a Captain of the Kriegsmarine. The load of T11 torpedoes and the desperate attempt to defend it do not characterize a man who knows he lost the war. They rather show that he was convinced that the end of the war had not yet come and the weapons he carried would still be needed. 

The second hypothesis is the desire to sell the torpedoes and setting up in Argentina for the rest of his life. If so, however, would he risk the lives of the whole crew? There are many doubts as to what motivated the Captain to fight. Perhaps it was a sense of duty; he was given orders that had to be carried out although the war was lost. Perhaps, however, the destination was not Argentina, but a secret German base in Antarctica? The possibility of leading a life in the land of Shangri-la and the participation in developing the race of supermen was very tempting for ideological Nazis. For Captain Herbert Nollau the moment when his ship was destroyed was a huge failure that tormented him until his suicide in 1968. It is possible that throughout the whole period from the end of the war he was harassed with secret services wanting to discover the real aim of his expedition. Or maybe he knew that he had forever lost his place in the Great New World? 

However, fate made history take a different course. Now, the restored U-543 can be seen in the Woodside Ferry Terminal in Birkenhead, near Liverpool, for 5 ₤ from Monday to Sunday.

Andrzej Lepper's death – short comment

I was staying far away from Poland when I heard the news about the death of Andrzej Lepper. It was a cynical, uncompromising, quite insolent, but still forthright and artless person. He was very confident of who he is and what he is fighting for. Former vice-prime minister, the marshall of Sejm, minister of agriculture was found dead on August 5th in his party's office in Warsaw. This politician seemed to have very strong personality. I remember very well his speeches (famous: „Balcerowicz must go”), spontanous activity such as blocking roads and everything was done for simple people, to defend the interest of Polish countryside. Even though, was he so strong that it is impossible to do what he had done? It was already ascertained that he was seen alive for a last time on August 6th at 8:30. The body was found at 16:20 by Lepper's son-in-law, half an hour later police and paramedics arrived. The body was examined at 22 o'clock. Why it was 6 hours after it was claimed that it was suicide? Why nobody asked what was happenning with Lepper for almost 8 hours? Who he was meeting with before his death, he said that he had an appointment? 

Did the fact that he had anounced a day before that he is planning to start in comming elections had change anything? What kind of information had pushed a man used to hard life to commit such a suprising decision? Are we going to wait another months for the results of the investigation? Making dramatic events blurred is common in Polish politics. We still did not learn who had sent Rywin, it took months to learn how Barbara Blida had died, the history of police comissioner Marek Papała's death still remains unexplained. We have no idea what was the reason of minister Dębski death. There are culprits and witnesses hanging themselves in prisons without any reason. Why? This still remains a secret. What is connecting all these cases? It is undoubtfully Polish politics where happens a lot but its rarely being explained.

Postcard from Argentina

The title may sound like sent from holidays but it is much more interesting to write from the southern hemisphere, where I am now, studying one interesting plot, which has been haunting me for years. There are holidays anyway, so this entry will be a bit different. However, it concerns matters that I have mentioned on my blog seweral times. This topic which is bothering me for a while is what hapenned with Adolf Hitler and his personal guard after leaving Europe. I have already written why I do not believe in Hitler’s death at the Reich Chancellery. I have also put a thesis that Antarctica was a real place of the III Reich’s leader death (more information about this soon). Argentina was still a country that played (maybe plays?) a crucial role. 

San Carlos de Bariloche
source: Wikipedia.org

Contrary to what can it seems to be on these pictures, this is not a village hidden among the Alpine peaks, but San Carlos de Bariloche which is located in the Rio Negro province in Argentina. According to the Argentinian journalist, Abel Basti, it was actually a place where Adolf Hitler stayed with Ewa Braun. They were supposed to be taken to the Argentinian businessman’s estate - Jorge Antonio, one of the trusted partners of a three times president of Argentina, Juan Domingo Perón. The estate was isolated from the outside world. The only way to get there was by boat or by plane. 

San Carlos de Bariloche
source: Wikipedia.org

In his book, a guide, which Basti published few years ago, he presented a number of places, where SS-men were supposed to live and work. These were often high-ranking people in the Nazi hierarchy, such as Josef Mengele or Adolf Eichmann who was later captured by Mossad. They were sought after in Europe and Israel. They were guilty of war crimes they committed. However, in Argentina, they worked normally without hiding their identity for local companies that in majority were created thanks to the gold brought from Europe.

San Carlos de Bariloche
source: Wikipedia.org

Nazis in Argentina, which stayed out of the war theatre, were not treated like criminals. Even more, many of them, educated and rich, were valuable citizens for this South American country. Did such citizens have influence on the Argentinian government? It is very probable. After all, people who governed this country knew that the nazis’ escape there. In such town like Bariloche, a lot of Germans could surely feel like they were at home, and live calmly till the end of their life without fear that somebody would bother them. I hope that I will manage to encounter another trace in America.

Attack on Japan

In my previous post I have written about Benjamin Fulford, journalist who is analysing global events from the perspective of Asian secret societies. It is important to say, that Fulford claims, that in recent time there was serious break up between the Iluminati connected with USA and Europe and secret societies in Asia, especially in Japan and China. He also points out, that the societies have made a close cooperation with Russians, who also do not like Iluminati plans of not only starting the Third World War byt first of all massive depopulation, as a result of which there will be only a part of people who are living on Earth at the moment. 

Asia is being on regularly attacked by the Iluminati who want not only to weaker its potential but first of all to make whole region lost what it has got the most precious – people. They were trying to do it at least several times, by forcing Japan to join the war with USA, later by bombing the largest catholic community in Asia (what is more, Japanese catholics were also opposing emperors politics) living in Nagasaki, later by letting Mao Zendog's bloody regime to be established in China. When Japan was on its best way to become the first economical power in the world, according to several comentators, it had met with the financial attack from the Rotschild bank at the beginning of 1990's. Since that time, Japan is in a long tern recesion. Is it true? When we listen to the critics of polifluence, the last attack on Japan had taken totally different form. There are several reasons, in their opinion, that the earthquake and later tsunami were not created by natural causes. One of the effects of this hypotetical operation was great, actually still unknown in its effects catastrophy in the plant in Fukushima. 

Is it a real effect of the planned activity of the Western elits who want to take control over the secret societies in the Eastern Asia? 

Even Chinese communists had understood such danger and have changed their attitude towards Taiwan, where the most influential organizations have their base. Fulford himself claims that they have contacted with him and asked him to become a spokesperson informing about the most important things. Whatever we may think he is a person who understands local affairs, as he lives for almost 20 years in Japam as well as he speaks local language fluently. I promise that soon I will write more about what happens in Asia at the moment. It is very interesting region and it is worth to observe it.