Closer and closer to this year's Bilderberg conference. What they will talk about?

The political and business elite will gather in a private group to discuss a program that will determine the future of the most important global issues. Some aspects of the conference gradually forge the public. Topics to be addressed are worldwide tax system and giant Google. What may decide the association of the most influential people?

fot. globalresearch.ca

The Bilderberg Group is an informal international club of the most influential people from the worlds of politics, business and industry. Group meetings are held once a year. In the course discusses the major issues concerning the world including security policy or the economy. Initially it was claimed that this year's conference (like last year) will be held in Chantilly, Virginia (USA). Today we know that the meeting will be held June 6-9 at the Grove in Hertfordshire (England).

In addition to all the "fanfare" around the game, but still remains the most important question: what issues will be discussed at this year's ultra-secret meeting of the Group Bildergerg? The company Google is currently involved in the "battle of unpaid taxes" in the UK. Thus led to political comments, most of which call for a 'new global system of taxation". It is postulated that this topic will be one of the main discussions of the Bilderberg.

In recent years there has been an increase of participants-digital giants. In addition to the software world giants such as Craig Mundie, chief research and strategy at Microsoft (2006-2012 Bilderberg participant) and Google CEO Eric Schmidt (2007-2011 Bilderberg participant) will be a key player Peter Thiel, head of Clarium Capital, ie the company that launched the so-known portals like Paypal, Facebook, LinkedIn or Friendster.

Does Google can be a kind of "Trojan horse" needed to implement a global tax system? Possibly. It is worth mentioning that the global tax could mean imminent prospect of a global government, which certainly would be on hand most of the Bilderberg Club. Observers add that extra excuse to create a global framework for the taxation of the economic crisis, is located in "perfect for this moment."

One thing is certain: the wealthiest in the world consistently aim to ensure that corporations are able to use all international tax loopholes to their advantage. Small and medium-sized enterprises as well as individual entrepreneurs have little say in here - in fact, today counts only voice (including political) Google and Facebook. If we can work out a compromise in the Club Bildergerg, the next step is to debate the G8 (the meeting is scheduled for 17-18 June).

Although popular in socialist circles, the idea of ​​a global tax system has never been widely debated for fear of public backlash (in 2011 called for the introduction of a global tax on financial transactions - "Robin Hood tax" was quickly forgotten) Perhaps this year's event Bilderberg will lead us to a "global Google tax", which in time will open the way for politicians to something bigger.

Plans to implement a completely new global tax system should worry anyone who appreciates the concept of national sovereignty. To make matters worse, the whole structure can be implemented without a vote of citizens in each country... Do you believe that a forecast for this year's Bilderberg Group meeting can be checked? What may be the subject of further consideration of the informal club?

What were the Bilderbergs talking about?

Let's return for a moment to the topic of Bilderberg Group meeting and what decisions were made in Switzerland this year. The majority of analytics interested in this case have pointed, that the main subject of this year's meeting was a euro-zone crisis. The main accent was put on the Greek problems. Maybe it was the crucial element of the debate, as we have seen the president of European Council, Herman van Rompuy there, but surely it is not the only one. 

What the Bilderbergs were talking about? Except the economic crisis one of the major topics was probably growing destabilization in the Middle East. How much „the Arab Spring” is an example of democracy, which can be controlled from outside? Is it a programmed background for a wider conflict? To move out present power structures in order to rebuild the economic influence areas? If the world elits were really interested in calming the whole situation there, would they send their armies to Libya or Yemen after resigning of diplomatical solutions so rapidly? 

There coul be also another topic of this informal summit. Maybe they were talking about the growing number of the breaks in the Earth and repeating more and more often earthquakes in the Pacific basin? In this context the results of these earthquakes, serious pollution which affected Eastern Japan nobody wanted to inform us about? 

Or maybe it is something completely different, the growing activity of unidentified flying objects, and as one of consequences, constant politics of creating no-fly zones in different parts of the United States? Or maybe it was the date when the fact that the UFO is being with us for years and is not only a fairy tale for some weird pseudo-scientists, would be revealed? 

As we can see, there are many subjects to discuss. It reminds me an old Chineese curse: „I wish you lived in the interesting times”. We live, indeed.

Bilderberg and Polish affairs

There is not much spoken about the Polish attenders of the Bilderberg Group meetings. It is worth to remind that one of the Group’s initiators was Pole, Józef Hieronim Retinger. Włodzimierz Kalicki had written about him:

He influenced Polish affairs by taking Sikorski from capitulating France. He influenced Europe’s destiny and the Atlantic alliance by his work on organizing the Congress in Hague and Bilderberg Group. 

Until the year 1989 it was hard to meet the representation of Polish People’s Republic, it had changed after the Third Polish Republic was established. Many prominent politicians and businessmen were closely connected with the group. The best known participant is Andrzej Olechowski, who attended the meetings since 1994. Between the other participants we can find:

Hanna Suchocka – former Polish prime minister - 1998
Sławomir Sikora – chairman of Polish branch of Citibank – 2004
Jacek Szwajcowski – 2005 (Polish Farmacy Group)

What is most interesting since the 2008 when former Polish president Aleksander Kwasniewski was attending the Bilderberg meeting there was none of Polish participants. Actually we can notice that the are less people from “our” part of Europe. What can this mean? There are few assumptions. It is possible that the region of Central-Eastern Europe had lost its meaning and “our” representatives are not invited anymore, or the allies had changed and people who now came to power are playing for another team. Then comes another question, for which?

Bilderberg meetings under cover

In the previous post I was informing, that between June 9 and 11th there will be a Bilderberg Group meeting in Switzerland. I have written then, that the so called “mainstream” media do not pay on these meetings so much attention as they ought to. I must admit, that I was wrong. This year the meeting is being a matter of interest, but the main actors in these communicates are people, who are against the Bilderbergs. They are considered as the trackers, supporters or even devoted believers of the conspiracy theories, which automatically is supposed to mean, that there is no sense in listening to their opinions. Well, as I find myself also included to this respectable group, I feel obliged to comment it. 

For example, in one of the most important Swiss newspapers for German speakers “Basler Zeitung” we could find an article, saying that the Bilderberg Group meeting do not mean much, because there are hardly any important decisions being made. We cannot check this information empirically, but we can seek for counterarguments. According to PrisonPlanet.com former general secretary of NATO and Bilderberg Group member, Willy Claes had claimed that after the meeting special report is being prepared “the participants are then obviously considered to use this report in setting their policies in the environments in which they affect”.

Another classical strategy is to make the arguments sound completely foolish. I really suggest to check the commentaries which were published by the editors of the Fox News. The idea promoted by them was that if the meetings are what they are supposed to be, they should be organized in the underground cave. Everyone is laughing, the aim is accomplished. 

The same thing can be done with all the people interested in such case by gathering them into one group, just like the author of an article in BBC Magazine. We can see that he did at least the basic homework and he had prepared himself to write this article. Of course, it was impossible to avoid psychological analysis of everyone, who we consider, as conspiracy theory “believers”. In order to leave the readers any doubts about them and to close them all in straitjacket as the only example of conspiracy theorists was presented David Icke with his reptilian ruling the world theory. Well, even if Icke was right, there are not so many people who would be take proper action inspired by his theories. 

In fact, if we want to discover where are the real decision makers we must understand, that the politics, economy and media are one system. There is a reason that the people representing the most important media such as New York Times or Wall Street Journal are also invited to Bilderberg Group meetings. There must be a reason why they are trifling the news about Bilderberg. Finally, somebody must pay for these enormously expensive adverts...

Andrew Kakabadse, who interviewed many Bilderberg attenders had claimed that: 

"The Bilderbergs are probably the most influential global network of all time. It's an honor to be invited, it's a tremendous honor. Part of it is recognition for work done and part of it is for contribution to enabling world affairs.”

Let’s suppose that Andrew Kakabadse is right and only the people who had achieved something are being invited, that only they are being “drag” into the elite. There is no question about that, they had achieved a lot because of their individual skills, determination, intelligence, their luck, but did it happen without anobody’s help?

Why these people are being invited and others are not? Their achievements are being undoubtedly counted, but there is surely a specific kind of merits being promoted, because we may notice that certain people are always welcomed, while others are not. For example Italian deputy, Mario Borghezio, who is against the club for years, was beaten and arrested after he attempted to enter the Bilderberg meeting on June 10th. He stated, that he is against the group because decisions which are being made there are without influence of public opinion. “It is clear, that Bilderberg Club is a secret society” he added.

Time for the world government’s meeting

They meet one a year in a chosen place in the world, nobody knows neither what is happenning during the meetings, nor what decisions are being made. Monarchs, most influentiral politicians, businessmen and scientists. Sounds like conspiracy theory? The meetings of the Bilderberg group are regularly traced. But nobody knows what is going on behind the closed door. 

The group is being called “Bilderberg” after a hotel where was the first meeting in 1954. Since that time, despite the fact that the most influential people on this planet are meeting in one place, the information about them are whether ignored or treated as not so important. They are not surrounded by thousands of photographers. Until now, the meetings were rarely present in “respected” media. It’s hard expect extensive comments, analyzes and forecasts which take place during such meetings like Davos or G8. This year the Bilderberg group is meeting between June 9 and 12 in the Grand Hotel Kempinski in St. Moritz, Switzerland. 

If many “serious” journalists are not interested in this subject, let’s become a bit less serious and think, what decisions would be made this time?